What Is The Difference Between 304 And 316 Stainless Steel Pipe

The main difference between 304 and 316 stainlesscan significantly impact the corrosion rate. Halides
steel pipe is that 316 contains 2%-3% molybdenumgenerally increase corrosion while aeration or the
and 304 has no molybdenum. The "moly" is added topresence of oxidizing agents usually increases the
improve the corrosion resistance to chlorides (like seacorrosion rate of non-ferrous materials  and reduces
water). So, while 316 stainless steel pipe is generallythe corrosion rates of stainless steel pipe alloys. I
considered more corrosion resistant than 304,strongly recommend laboratory corrosion studies be
depending on the nature of the corrosive media therun on your specific stream as a part of your
corrosion rates of 304 and 316 could be similar.material of construction selection process.
Generally, SS 304/304L is assumed to beI have a large storage tank of 93% sulfuric acid. I am
corrosion-resistant material. But when we come tohaving excessive corrosion of the top of the 4-inch
Piping Specs with SS 304/304L MOC, its value iscarbon steel outlet pipe. I am thinking of replacing the
taken as 0.063 inches -- same for SS316/316L .outlet pipe with Schedule 120 carbon steel pipe. Is
Please explain.there any more resistant material, insert, or coating
We have a plant that produces fertilizer. In oneyou could recommend for increased life?
section we mix 40% phosphoric acid and 98%Carbon steels are only acceptable for 93% sulfuric
sulfuric acid together in a ratio of 75-80 : 25-20acid when fluid velocity is low (< 3 ft/sec). For
phosphoric acid:sulfuric acid. After that the mixture is4-inch diameter piping or less with velocities up to 5.9
cooled to a temperature of 80 degrees C. What isft/sec, 316L stainless steel pipe is a good choice. For
the best material of construction for transfer piping?velocities higher than 5.9 ft/sec, Alloy 20Cb-3 (UNS
The existing material, 304 stainless steel pipe, showsN08020) has been used successfully. For additional
problems at the welds.information, consult NACE Recommended Practice
From a materials of construction perspective, this is aRP-0391 "Materials for the Handling and Storage of
tricky mixture to deal with, especially at 80 degreesCommercial Concentrated (90 to 100%) Sulfuric Acid
C and higher. Phosphoric acid is less corrosive thanat Ambient Temperatures."
sulfuric acid. Pure phosphoric acid has no oxidizingIn your question, you said you are experiencing
power but commercial phosphoric acid containsproblems with 304 stainless steel pipe at the welds. If
impurities such as fluorides and chlorides that canthis is the case, you might consider moving to 304L
significantly increase its corrosivity. The corrosivity ofstainless steel pipe. Low carbon versions of austenitic
sulfuric acid depends on many factors includingStainless steel seamless pipe like 304L are designed
temperature, concentration, the presence of oxidizingto eliminate problems associated with carbide
or reducing impurities, velocity effects, and solids inprecipitation and chromium depletion at welds. If 304L
suspension.doesn't work, try gradually moving up to a higher
It is usually not wise to select materials ofalloy. Possible candidate materials in order of generally
construction for sulfuric acid handling equipmentincreasing corrosion resistance are: 316L stainless steel
based only on published corrosion data since corrosionpipe, 20-type alloys like 20Cb-3, higher chromium
by sulfuric acid is a complex phenomenon. SmallFe-Ni-Mo alloys like Alloy 31, and nickel-base
differences in impurities, velocity, or concentrationmolybdenum-chromium alloys like C-276.