| Many steel fabricators and industrial painting | | | | The use of a low temperature epoxy without an |
| operations are not aware of some of the recent | | | | accelerator can eliminate or slow this problem. |
| changes in epoxy technology. In the past, when you | | | | 3) By using an accelerator, you are adding an |
| were painting in cold weather with an epoxy you | | | | additional step in the painting or coating process that |
| needed to add an accelerator to the material in order | | | | can be messed up. For instance, your mixture of the |
| to get the product to cure (or dry) in a reasonable | | | | accelerator could be incorrect resulting in a coating |
| time. This is no longer necessary, because there are | | | | problem/failure. The simpler you can keep the |
| now low-temperature cure epoxies from paint | | | | system, the less likely possible problems will occur. |
| manufacturers on the market which do not require | | | | Some of these epoxies can now cure all the way |
| an accelerator. | | | | down to 0°F without any use of an accelerator. |
| Here are several reasons why switching to a | | | | Others can dry as quickly as 90 minutes to the touch |
| non-accelerated low temperature epoxy is good for | | | | with surface temperatures at 20°F. You will to |
| your business: | | | | contact your paint manufacturer to see what they |
| 1) Accelerators can add a significant cost on a per | | | | have available and to cross-reference an epoxy that |
| gallon basis; Having an epoxy coating that does not | | | | will be close in overall performance to what you are |
| need an accelerator could reduce your per gallon cost | | | | currently using. Don't delay on making this switch, as |
| greatly. | | | | it could eliminate potential problems and reduce your |
| 2) Accelerators usually weaken the coating by | | | | overall costs greatly. |
| making it more brittle and causing it to yellow faster; | | | | |