Exploring the Differences Between the Powis Parker Fastback 9 and the Unibind XU138 Binding Machine

Thermal binding is a great way to quickly andPrice is definitely a factor when it comes to choosing
elegantly bind your important documents. There arebinding equipment. The Unibind XU138 is a lot cheaper
two very popular thermal binding machines currentlythan the Fastback 9 and it can be purchased for less
on the market: the Powis Parker Fastback 9 and thethan $400.00, so it is great for people who need to
Unibind XU138. Both of these machines producekeep a watchful eye on their budget. The Fastback 9
great-looking books whenever they're used and, atis a lot pricier and costs more than $2,000.00. This will
first glance, they appear to be very similar. But thereobviously put it out of reach for some companies
are some big differences between these twoand organizations, although one needs to consider the
machines. This article will let you know how thesecost of the supplies, as well. Fastback materials are
machines differ so you can make a wise decisionmuch less expensive than Unibind ones. It costs
when purchasing a thermal binding machine.about $1.00 per document to bind with Unibind
The Unibind XU138 is a machine that can be usedsupplies, whereas a document bound with a Fastback
with a variety of binding supplies, including Unibindspine will only set you back about $0.30. Therefore, if
photobooks and Steelbook spines, so you have a lotyou're going to be doing a lot of binding, a Fastback
of options when binding your documents. Unibindmachine might eventually pay for itself, given how
binding supplies contain a steel strip for maximuminexpensive the supplies are.
durability. These spines are U-shaped and contain anMany people are concerned about the environment.
adhesive that is activated by heat. Booklets boundIf you are one of them, you will probably want to go
with Unibind spines cannot lay flat nor can the pageswith Powis Parker over Unibind. Powis Parker is
wrap around. However, you can only bind documentsknown in the binding industry for being an extremely
that are up to 340 pages in length.green company. All of their binding supplies are
Fastback spines are far more flexible. The spines,eco-friendly (complete with non-toxic adhesive) and if
known as LX strips, are paper-based and theyyou use the company's LX strips when binding, you
feature a thermally activated glue backing.will be able to fully recycle your item if you do not
Documents bound with a Fastback machine will layneed it anymore. (You cannot do that at all with a
flat, unlike those bound with a Unibind machine. Plus,booklet bound with a Unibind machine. The steel spine
with the Fastback 9 you will have the ability to usemakes it impossible.) So, if saving the planet is an
your own custom covers on the front and back ofissue for you, Fastback is the way to go.
your document. You can even use a custom printedWhen it comes right down to it, you need to choose
strip for binding the spine of your document. That isthe binding machine that best suits your needs. The
something that the Unibind simply can't compete with.Unibind XU138 is easy to use and you can create
You undoubtedly want a machine that can bind thegreat-looking documents with it. It is also inexpensive.
most documents in the least amount of time. TheHowever, you are very limited in the thickness of the
Unibind XU138 is capable of binding severaldocuments you can produce, plus your booklets
documents not totaling more than 36 millimeter inwon't lay flat. Meanwhile, Fastback spines offer more
thickness is under a minute. Thus, you can bind oneflexibility and are environmentally friendly, but the
36 mm document or several smaller ones per minute.machine is definitely pricy. (But keep in mind that the
The Fastback 9, on the other hand, can only bindsupplies are cheaper.) Whichever machine you
one document at once in about 40 seconds. So ifchoose, be sure to choose the machine that's right
binding several documents at once is important, thefor both your budget and your binding needs.
Unibind machine would be the better choice.